Here’s an intriguing question: in the Pittsburgh Pirates case, is the 25-man roster always the best 25 players?

 

This is a fun time of year. The beginning of another baseball season is almost upon us. One of the topics that is continuously discussed now is the formation of the 25-man roster. The past several years there has been a thought that regardless of all other facts, the best 25 players should be on the roster when the season starts. Admittedly, at first glance the idea has a lot of merit and sounds good as a sound bite for a sports radio talk show. However, when you look at things a little deeper, the idea seems to fall apart.

Younger Players Need Work Too

It’s a story that is almost as old as baseball itself; the fans feel the hot prospect should be on the major league roster. The general manager feels otherwise and, stating the player needs “more work,” he starts in the minor leagues. More often than not the general manager is right as we Pirate fans have seen most recently with Gregory Polanco. Granted Polanco is no longer a prospect, but I think it is abundantly clear if he had one more season in the minor leagues, it would have been better for him.

Here Comes the Money

There is a very real point to be discussed about the money factor, something near and dear to Pirate fans everywhere. For a team that has limited resources like the Pirates, this is a real concern and will be until there is a magic revenue solution. Monetary concerns are not just about the number of years of control for prospects. Consideration also needs to be given to players the Pirates signed and had to be placed on the 40-man roster. Like it or not, to paraphrase Cyndi Lauper, money can change everything.

Positional Flexibility

As we all know, because the Pirates play in mostly National League parks, the pitcher is required to hit. As a result, sometimes you need to do things like make double switches. In order to do that, you need players that have positional flexibility. And if you have a good prospect who can only play one position, that player doesn’t have the flexibility needed for a bench role.

Injuries

Finally, injuries play a part in not having the best 25 players on the roster. With the Pirates having Jung Ho Kang, Jared Hughes, and potentially Mike Morse on the disabled list, this prevents the Pirates from having their best 25 on the roster for the beginning of the season.

Although it sounds good to always have the best 25 players on the roster, they are not always the right 25.

Thanks for checking us out here at Pirates Breakdown. Please make sure to follow us on Twitter and Instagram and like us on Facebook for the best Pirates coverage all year long!

Aaron Benedict

Aaron Benedict is a Pittsburgh Ex-Pat now living in Brooklyn, NY with his wife and daughter. His first Pirate game was in 1977 at Three Rivers Stadium against the Houston Astros. When he is not blogging about the Pirates or on his own site, he enjoys reading almost anything.

  • redrage97

    One name came to me last night, Allen Craig 3 straight seasons of .300 hitting in StLouis.. dumped by them and now in the minors in boston. I looked today after i noticed a story about Sandoval and the Redsox expensive bench… Craig has had a strong spring and is owed at least 20M next two and 1M buy out on a third

    I’m sure the Sox would like to off load him even if they pay most of his salary.. I don’t have much confidence hes back to form and with Jaso, Morse, Bell and maybe Freese in the mix doesn’t make a lot of sense.. but just a thought on a guy who seems to be a pretty good fielder.

  • Pingback: Is the best 25 man roster the right 25 man roster? – Benedict Blog()